View From The Sphere

Should Arsenal double their £10M bid for this England international?

|
Image for Should Arsenal double their £10M bid for this England international?

Arsenal recently tabled a £10 million offer for Everton centre-back Phil Jagielka, and as my fellow blogger Mike Holmes stated a couple of days back, it was a very worthy first bid made by the Gunners.

Everton are in no mood to accept such offers and have reportedly asked Arsenal to come back with an offer of around £20 million if they want to sign the England international – an amount which doubles the initial offer Arsenal tabled.

But should Arsenal go to the extent of making a £20 million bid for Jagielka?

Is he a good option for Arsene Wenger to pursue?

Well in all honesty, I am finding it difficult to find the right answer here.

I am pretty sure Wenger would have studied the pros and cons of signing Jagielka by now. I am also sure (if Wenger decides to go for him) that the Frenchman has the negotiation skills to secure a deal in the region of £14-15 million, and if there is any club that is in need of money, it is Everton.

Given the resources available to Moyes, it was a fantastic result for the Toffees to finish seventh last season. But, if they are to compete against fierce rivals Liverpool this season and challenge for a Europa League spot, they need serious investment in the squad. So a £15 million offer for Jagielka will be extremely tempting for the Merseyside club.

But what can Jagielka bring to this Arsenal line-up?

The Englishman certainly has tons of Premier League experience under his belt.

He is 28 years old and has played regularly in the Premier League for over six years now. This kind of experience is something Arsenal could do with. He is also technically superior than Arsenal’s other two targets – Gary Cahill and Chris Samba. In my opinion, I believe he will fit into our team better than the other two defenders mentioned above and would be a perfect partner for Thomas Vermaelan.

Jagielka possesses decent pace and is also a threat at offending set-pieces. His tackling and marking is also very good and he is the kind of ball playing centre-back that Wenger has been craving for.

His other strength is that he is very versatile. I’ve seen him play at right-back for Everton once, where he looked very comfortable and assured.

Personally, I feel Phil has got enough skill and technique to play competently in the holding midfielder role too (I am not too sure if he has played here before), and can be used as a tactical ploy in important games like Pepe was for Real Madrid last season.

On the other hand, he isn’t the ‘tall player’ Wenger was talking about earlier in the summer.

Physically, The Everton defender is less imposing than that of Cahill or Samba, but is still better than Johan Djourou and Laurent Koscielny in the air. Still, he will not improve Arsenal’s set-piece defending as much as someone like Samba would. One more worry is his age. Jagielka isn’t too old at 27, but Samba is of the same age and is available for less (approximately £11 million). Cahill is three years younger at 24, and valued at £17 million – he is more of a long-term investment.

Most importantly, I believe Jagielka wouldn’t be a regular starter at the Emirates.

I rate him on par with Koscielny and Djourou, and his potential arrival will only bring more competition for places. This might make all three defenders work harder and improve their performances, but what Arsenal are in dire need of is a first choice partner for the Verminator. Someone like Samba would be a first-team regular at Arsenal because of his imposing presence and aerial ability – this isn’t the case with Jagielka though.

If available for around £14-15 million, Jagielka would be a fantastic signing for us, purely because of the experience and versatility he would bring to the squad, as well as providing healthy competition for places. However, any more money than the amount I stated, then Arsenal should look elsewhere – Cahill? Samba? Even Subotic?

One thing is for certain, £20 million for a centre-back is absolutely absurd.

Like what you read? Then follow me on Twitterhttp://twitter.com/gunnerviv

Visit and Join our Facebook page, click HERE to do so.

Gunnersphere is currently looking for new writers to join the squad. Contact via twitter or at Gunnersphere@snack-media.com for further details.

Share this article

15 comments

  • NickW says:

    A Good article but despite being a very good player I really don’t think Jagielka is what Arsenal need right now. Our main problem is dealing with set pieces because we are not winning the first ball into the box. This creates panic and goal scoring opportunities for the opposition. Therefore what we most need is a defender who is going to dominate in the air and I don’t think at 5’11”, Jagielka is that man. So if I had to choose I’d take Samba and then Cahill or even Shawcross ahead of Jagielka. Also at 28 he’s not worth £15 million.

  • mike says:

    I think Jagielka would be worth maybe going up to 15 million, but no higher. The other option for me is Cahill (although I’d prefer Jags). Both are English so keep us up on the home-grown quota, and Cahill cleared more with his head than any other player last season (I think). Either would make us a better defensive team. Verm, Djourou, Kos and either Cahill or Jags would be a great selection to chose from. I also think that Bartley is looking like a genuine first team prospect, so if we can get one quality player in this summer, I reckon our CB problems could be over for a few years.

  • Speaking as an Everton season ticket holder, just thought I’d offer my views on Jagielka. (Spotted the article on Google). Personally, I think if we accept anything upwards of £15million then we are getting a great deal. Afraid to say, he is not the ball playing centre half you would like to think he is. His distribution is probably one of his worst attributes and the notion that he is fast is also wide of the mark. Whilst he is not Sol Campbell-slow, he is not particularly fast.

    He is a very good tackler though and always committed whilst giving 100% and is good in the air when heading opposition goal kicks away. However when defending set pieces in our box, he often looks a bit of a liability. He goes for everything, which can obviously work out good and bad, sometimes.

    I have to disagree though, I think if he did sign then he would be first choice. His passing may not be up to much but as an out and out defender, he is definitely better than Djourou and Koscielny.

  • Theophilus says:

    I’m very sory,arsenal don’t to spend much on player like chelsea cahill if don’t believe jagielka beyond that 10 £

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *