Date: 4th July 2019 at 9:20am
Written by:

When news broke of ’s £40m bid for Wilfried Zaha, perhaps the most standout feature of it was the fact its sum was the entirety of Arsenal’s reported budget.

On the face of it, that would suggest Arsenal were simply going all-in on and hoping for the best – but let’s face it, in today’s market, a player of Zaha’s quality could be considered cheap at that price.

And with ’s apparent unwillingness to let him go, especially just after allowing Aaron Wan-Bissaka to leave for £50m, there is logic in placing Arsenal’s bid under the ‘derisory’ column.

The Times’ was clearly all too aware of this when he branded the bid ‘a joke’ on Twitter, and while he may have a point when it comes to the unrealistic hope of Palace selling for a fee so low(ish), there is surely an argument to be made that as negotiations go, £40m is merely a starting point for Arsenal:

Of course, there is the instant contradiction that any progression on £40m would see Arsenal spend beyond their means, and with little money accrued to boost funds so far this summer, amassing enough cash through sales looks unlikely to be enough to tempt Palace if their reported £120m(!) price tag is to be believed.

Since The ’ initial ‘joke’ of a bid is the first we’ve heard of in terms of a Zaha approach, surely the club have something else up their sleeves – is that not how negotiations work?